Payoffs to Expect from Good Compliance Software

  • by gcarroll@fasttrackaust.com (Greg Carroll)
  • 24 Apr, 2013
How proactive compliance tools increase bottom-line returns, thereby fulfilling key director performance criteria

Part 1 of a series on the key criteria of director compliance performance

In 30 years of offering compliance tools, we've seen organisations try to tackle compliance in a lot of different ways. Some are good. Some are poor. One of the poorest is with a manual system. When I say "manual," I include the use of ad hoc desktop applications for compliance record keeping.

Manual systems are a legacy of the days when there wasn't really much choice. Everything a business did was documented on paper. What is surprising is the number of organisations still using this 19th century system to tackle a 21st century job.

Manual systems typically fall short on a number of critical points. To start with, a piece of paper can only be in one place at a time. Whether paper or desktop application, manual systems can lead to many different versions of the truth, administrative waste through duplications and handling costs, a lack of information at the point of decision making, and slow reaction times. The result is confusion and poor performance. It creates a culture of divisiveness, secrecy, and blame.

Achieving calm amid chaos

This sense of controlled chaos is often mislabeled as a ‘high-pressure environment’. But having observed true high-pressure environments for more than 30 years, I can tell you the notion couldn’t be further from the truth. In truly critical situations, when people’s lives were in the balance, professionals show an amazing level of calm. The common thread is their adherence to strict compliance frameworks with the implicit knowledge that they can rely on the competence, equipment and information required.

Later in this series of posts I will deal with long-term benefits of good compliance systems, but here I want to deal with the low-hanging fruit for management: The elimination of delays, duplication, and administrative handling.

Record keeping is often a lazy way to tick the box

A lot of people make the mistake of thinking of compliance systems as an overhead -- a burden to business. This is due to the proliferation of record keeping systems under the guise of compliance systems. It is just a lazy approach to ticking the box. Record keeping is primarily for audit purposes, i.e. proof of what you do, and therefore should be recorded automatically as tasks are carried out. In fact, automated record keeping is already a by-product of day-to-day operational activity in most enterprise applications today.

A good compliance system does so much more. It immediately delivers the strategic benefits of quickly responding to opportunities, greater efficiency through less firefighting, and streamlining processes and communication. That combination leads to a paradigm shift in business growth and productivity.

Less firefighting and more problem solving

Good compliance systems identify process deficiency, inefficiencies, and breakdowns in communications, which invariably lead to multiple handing, rework and reduced production time. Get to the roots of the problem, and you produce real cost savings that go straight to the bottom line. For example Fast Track assists in these processes through:

  • Neural network architecture, which provides a powerful problem-solving tool for management
  • Coordination and automation of governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) activities, which eliminates duplication of both governance effort and operational overhead
  • Cause analysis reporting of problems, which highlights areas for action
  • A risk assessment calculator, which provides objective prioritization of allocation of time & resources
  • More electronic access to GRC data and task management, which means less reliance on physical travel for audit and inspections activities
  • A resource management module with rostering and resource availability, which reduces tasking conflicts and availability

Where compliance is implemented purely for regulatory record keeping, it only becomes a rod to the back of the business. It burdens staff while highlighting its faults and weaknesses. In contrast, proactive compliance tools are the source of improvement and elimination of waste. They increase bottom-line returns, thereby fulfilling key director performance criteria.

by gcarroll@fasttrackaust.com (Greg Carroll) 5 April 2017
The benefits of SharePoint as a content management system and information portal tool are indisputable.  With great search functionality and user definable portal pages SharePoint is now the leading Content Management solution chosen by most IT departments. But what if your business demands strict document controls protocols, not just because it’s good practice but life depends on it?  Unfortunately there is generally a poor appreciation by IT departments of the importance of document control in mission critical business. 
by gcarroll@fasttrackaust.com (Greg Carroll) 11 October 2016
It is not uncommon for laboratories to be saddled with maintaining both ISO 17025 and ISO 9001 certification. Although it is simpler to create and implement two QMS – and to "merge" those activities which can be merged – this approach is arduous, inefficient, and prone to mistakes.
by gcarroll@fasttrackaust.com (Greg Carroll) 15 September 2016
Senior management have to come to grips with the fact that Digital Transformation is not an Event but rather the operating environment of 21st century business. 
by gcarroll@fasttrackaust.com (Greg Carroll) 22 August 2016
Last week saw the latest in misguided innovation talkfests, the AFR Innovation Summit #Innovation16.  For several days academics, public servants, journalists, and corporate employees put forward their insights into how Australia can develop an Innovation culture. 
by gcarroll@fasttrackaust.com (Greg Carroll) 25 July 2016
Effectiveness is the holy grail of Compliance Management.  Whether regulatory or ERM, ensuring business is conducted as intended is the base requirement to optimising your organization’s performance.
by gcarroll@fasttrackaust.com (Greg Carroll) 17 June 2016
2016 has seen a virtual tsunami of compliance failures involving some of our largest companies. From Mitsubishi to VW, from ANZ to Target, almost weekly there have been media reports about some company employees having run amok – unbeknownst to their executives and boards. People are asking: “What happened to the compliance management systems that are supposed to monitor and prevent such abuses?” Executives and boards are naturally starting to question the entire compliance management function. 
by gcarroll@fasttrackaust.com (Greg Carroll) 7 September 2015
The Compliance Manager’s role in the modern organization is to enable/empower decision makers to take action and leave the building defensive walls to the Risk Manager with his heat maps. So how can compliance managers start realising their value adding role?
by gcarroll@fasttrackaust.com (Greg Carroll) 18 July 2015
With the release of the Final Draft of ISO9001:2015 this week and its focus on risk-based Compliance Management, I thought I would share our approach to Risk-Based Auditing from our experience with the likes of Defence Aviation and the Australian Quarantine Inspection Service, both leaders in the field.
by gcarroll@fasttrackaust.com (Greg Carroll) 3 July 2015
Mere compliance with a Framework is an insufficient audit approach; it is critical to assess whether it is current, timely, communicated broadly, and meets the needs of the business. The 4 biggest mistakes are:       Not being Outcome focused      Not using Risk base targeting      Not Value Adding      Not being timely
by gcarroll@fasttrackaust.com (Greg Carroll) 28 May 2015
Why, with the number of fertile minds that exist in our field, is it still a case of an irresistible force meeting an immovable object.  The paradox I believe, like our would-be entrepreneurs, is one of approach.
Show More
Share by: